Buy Tickets Sign Up for Starmail Account Log In
 

Need a domain name, click here for a free registration

Jun 15

Written by: Theatre Under The Stars
6/15/2009 1:49 PM

It was a fine affair, but it's not over yet! Leave your comments below about Cabaret, running June 16 through 28 at Hobby Center!

Tags:

78 comments so far...

Re: Cabaret talkback

Last night's performance I found to be very offensive. The sexual tones were far too graphic and added nothing to the show. We have been TUTS season subscribers for at least 15 years and found this to be by far the most disgusting play we have ever seen at TUTS. We have two other couples who have seats with us and we share the same opinions. We certainly will not recommend this play to anyone. I saw several people leave the show early and quite a few empty seats after intermission when people did not elect to return for the second act.

By Kathleen Collins on   6/17/2009 7:42 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I really loved the show. I wouldn't want every show to be this bold, but once in a while it's refreshing to see a brave show like this one. The MC was fantastic! Sally’s voice was great. I thought it was funny, moving, and perfectly raunchy in all the right places. Very well done!

By Sara on   6/17/2009 4:41 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I loved the show. It was one of the most visually stunning shows that I have ever seen on the TUTS stage. It was edgy, but often times great theatre is. I'm so glad that TUTS brought a production of this magnitude to Houston. I loved the elaborate sets. The performances, especially that of the emcee, were great. I loved the band on stage and in those costumes. The only regret my group had was that we weren't sitting at those cool tables in the orchestra pit! What a great idea & rare treat that would have been.

By Maria on   6/18/2009 10:40 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Last night show was amaizng! One of the best that I have seen at TUTS! I loved the edginess. The costumes and the sets were visually fantastic. The MC's performance was outstanding, as was Sally's character's voice. However, I thought the dancers (awesome) were better performers. She just didn't bring to life the Sally I know and love. I highly reccommend taking this one in . . .

By Rocky B. on   6/18/2009 11:26 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Ok, I am a purist. I saw the original and loved the movie version. The positives for me last night were that all of the songs were there and all of the cast performed wonderfuly. However, it now seems like a more sexually explicit circus with a ringmaster, acts with the costuming and wide open set. The original really had the grittiness of the era and the clubs at that time. The beginning of the Nazi take over was more subtlely handled. I saw a production of this show at Jones Hall years ago and it was wonderful and kept to the original concept. You felt an intimate connection with the setting that is not there with this production. Would I recommend this production..probably only to a select few and once was enough for me.

By Gladys on   6/18/2009 3:07 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I agree with most of the positives that have been stated. The sets were good, the dance scenes were great. My problem was with the Cabaret singer (Kathy Bowles) and the Cabaret MC. As soon as I saw the lady who played Sally, I knew there would be a problem. She had an appearance of a lounge singer, not a cabaret singer. She was not earthy enough, she did not have the strength to carry her role, and she did not. The MC performed well and interacted with the audience, which kept it alive and interesting. However, neither his makeup nor his performance let the audience know how grotesque and gruesome life was inside the cabaret, in total contrast and irony to the statements he makes that "Everything is beautiful in the Cabaret." These deficiencies in two of the lead characters caused me to be disappointed with the performance.

By David on   6/18/2009 3:32 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Gladys, sorry you weren't crazy about the show, but the movie version is actually completely different from the original production, which our show is closest to (the movie only retained 6 of the songs, and dropped entire characters and replaced them with new ones). Also, TUTS' production was the result of months of meticulous research done by the great creative team. You can read some of their notes here: http://www.tuts.com/images/SeasonShowDocs/CabaretResearch.pdf

By Thea Star on   6/18/2009 3:56 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I saw Cabaret last night and I have to say this was the best performance I have ever seen in Houston. I thought the cast, set , music and dance numbers were fabulous. Great direction! People who found it offensive, should stick to the more family rated shows, such as Mary Poppins or the Sound of Music. I thought it rocked and I am already recommending it to family and friends. I may go to see this again. Don't miss this one!!!

By David J on   6/19/2009 8:33 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I actually did see the "original" Broadway version and it was nothing like the show currently at the Hobby. Again I think that all of the cast was terrific. I also am well aware that the movie is different from the live show. I'm not a novice at the theater experience. I just felt like it was more circus than Cabaret. I wish the cast and crew a successful run and I look forward to seeing other productions at the Hobby.

By Gladys on   6/19/2009 10:53 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I have attended TUTS for many years with friends, and this time we felt old, prudish, and slightly offended. I loved the music - loved Sally - loved the older couple and the men's chorus, but really, the nudity wasn't necessary, the explicit sexual scenes turned me (and my friends) off. I was disappointed because I couldn't really enjoy this production.

By K.athy Z. on   6/19/2009 1:53 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Isn't it funny that this blog is "family friendly" and "offensive or inappropriate language" will be edited or deleted, but the show that people are blogging about was quite another story. There was definitely some talent on stage for Cabaret, but the overpoweringly vulgar tone of the entire production overshadowed any artistry that might have shone through. This one was over the top, and not in a good way. Good directors know that the story is in the script, and don't need to stage scene after scene of deadening crudeness to advance it. It just didn't work. I left at intermission. I would have left sooner, but (ironically) did not want to be rude and crawl over others on the row to do so. Also - TUTS might consider a two-seat policy for people who do not fit in their seats. I was forced to "share" my space with a stranger I did not intend to know quite as well as I did by the time I was able to politely exit.

By MsMac on   6/19/2009 7:29 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I have been a season subscriber to TUTS for some time now and generally feel their productions don't require any sort of caution. This production should have been clearly rated R+. I took three of my friends and was embarrassed. Had I known there would be graphic sexual overtones, a naked man, sex shadowed behind a thin curtain, and other offensive material I would have chosen not to attend. We left after Act one, which I thought would never end, and would have left sooner had we not been seated center orchestra.

I would not be a season subscriber if risque, offensive productions were the norm and would suggest that reviews and any articles about the production be candid so people can make an informed decision. ..."bold" hardly describes last night's performance. I would have simply discarded my tickets had I known.

By Allyson on   6/19/2009 8:29 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I have been a TUTS subscriber for 10 years and enjoyed most of the shows, but Cabaret was definitely an all-time low! I had seen Cabaret before on the stage in San Diego, Calif. and knew some of the scenes were risque, but that production was G-rated compared to last night's show! I felt so many of the scenes were not necessary to the premise of the original show. They were tasteless and crude. My daughter, who is a grown adult, and I left at Intermission. If we hadn't had a nice dinner before the show at Birraporetti's, would have considered the entire evening a waste of time! The only other show we have ever walked out of was "Hair"....another waste of time! Please don't bring either one of these back to TUTS!!!

By Joyce on   6/19/2009 10:24 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

To those who were offended by the show or felt it was too risque for their tastes, please note that TUTS has a very detailed description of the material in the show on both the TUTS.com web site and the ticket-buying site, and has placed warning messages in the theater in several places. If this is not the show for you, TUTS is going to great lengths to make sure you know it!

By Thea Star on   6/21/2009 10:20 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Thea is correct. Maybe there wasn't a notice to season ticket subscribers, but I bought my tickets online and I had to click through a warning message about the content. There were also notices posted at the entrances of the theater as a warning.

I'm coming from an interesting angle. The first version of Cabaret that I saw was the revival done by Sam Mendes a few years ago. That production, if memory serves, was even more sexually charged and gritty. I felt like the current show was trying to straddle the revival interpretation and the movie interpretation not always successfully. That's fine, but I will always love the first version I saw.

Sally's voice was great and the sets and lighting design were fantastic!

Finally I will never understand people that don't do five minutes of research before they attend a show. Look up a brief synopsis of a show online before you attend the theater. I don't want everything in Houston to be Mary Poppins and I don't want everything to be Cabaret. I want a mix and that is what TUTS brings us.

By Laurie on   6/21/2009 10:39 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Never in all my years have I seen such an amazing, beautiful, touching and outrageous production all rolled into one. Thank you TUTS for not dumbing down what director, Bill Berry and his creative team have accomplished! The sexuality was not for shock value and the nudity was more tame than you would see on network TV these days; MTV is more "shocking" than the site of two male characters bottoms. The sets were dazzling, the choreography supreb...I really wished I could have magically rewound in the middle of certain scenes because I wanted to slowly explore the intricasies of every step; the costunes were Tony Award-worthy! Do NOT miss this show, it is fully formed, and artistic masterpiece that I will never forget. Bravo Leslie Krtizer, Suzy Hunt, Allen Fitzpatrick, Tyler Hanes and especially Leo Ash Evens. Thank you, Thank you Thank you TUTS!

By Herr Shultz on   6/22/2009 8:21 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I thought Cabaret was the best show I have ever seen TUTS put on. It was FANTASTIC.

By James on   6/22/2009 2:10 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Best I can say is that it was defintely different. Some parts were good, some I could have done without. Took boldness to do what some of them did last night. This is one I won't go back to see. I wish the cast and everyone the best.

By Misty on   6/22/2009 2:22 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

This was my first time to see Cabaret and I was not disappointed. I have been anticipaing it for
months and felt it was very good.
Kudos to the Emcee!
I agree with the previous blogger who stated patrons should examine the websites and review the
play material prior to buying tickets. I fully expected risque and liked the way it was presented.
The stage setting was great. I can't believe anyone would/could have walked out mid-presentation. That is their right but, come on, advance preparation would have made them aware
of any possible offense.
This is art.........

By Cindy on   6/22/2009 2:23 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I've been to many shows over the years and am a new season subscriber. The set was good, singing good, acting ok, but I don't understand why simulated sex acts behing a sheet bring anything to the show. As a few have said it was vulgar at times and I have already told a few friends who were going later to not waste their time. Still love TUTS but Cabaret was not good.

By Mitch on   6/22/2009 2:24 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Cabaret was wonderful. I have seen the production in London which I thought was better only because the performance was actually ALLOWED to be much more free and explicit. There weren't old people sitting around complaining about sexual undertones, if you go to a cabaret this is what you expect anyway. If you think you would be offended by these sexual undertones then simply do not go because it isn't as if TUTS did not put out a disclaimer warning of the nature of the show. Two years ago when I saw the show in London, the "naked guy" actually was fully naked and the cabaret girls were topless. No one there seemed to complain, but I guess thats Britain for you. :) Good job TUTS! I look forward to many ore productions.

By Kayla on   6/22/2009 2:27 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

P.S. I dont think most people seemed to understand that the sex acts behind the sheet were meant to actually looked like sex acts behind a sheet on a stage performed in front of the cabaret's audience. They were not actually meant to suggest that the Emcee was really having sex behind a sheet with two women but rather the three were putting on a comedy like show for the people at the Kit Kat Klub.

By Kayla on   6/22/2009 2:30 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I have to admit this was the most risque show you guys have brought to the stage. I consider mysellf fairly open and do not mind the sexual overtones when they add to the theme of the show but this was a little over done. Can you tell me the reason I had to look at a naked backside of some guy and where that brought anything into the story line?
Saw many folks get up and walk out at that point and many more did not return from break.
To be quite honest I find it quite had to sit for a 1 1/2 first half.
I had a very hard time understanding the words as well with the Emcee. A little too much accent.
Still renewed for next year, 6th years straight I think. But honestly glad Cabaret is not on the ticket. Leave this one in Germany.

By Ron Keever on   6/22/2009 3:02 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

My wife and I applaud TUTS for having the courage to bring that show to Houston. I don't think TUTS would create a show like that but it was one of the options available to bring to town and I'm glad they did because I felt challenged by it. It gave us a concentrated look at things that go on in diluted fashion all around us -- often just beyond our view. Let's see, there was homosexuality, bi-sexuality, transvestism, prostitution, cheating, promiscuity, freeloading, abortion, violence, alcoholism, smuggling, unbridled nationalism and a huge dose of bigotry. Is that really so shocking? Heck, every now and then we find that one of our nation's best-known preachers has been doing a lot of that stuff. The show made us take note of things that we've become so good at ignoring and sometimes a reality check is useful. The show also demonstrated that good intentions try to emerge even in the most unlikely places.

By Regulars on   6/22/2009 3:21 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

First, for those who thought it was too risque, tuts warned everyone quite a lot that the show was based on what the cabaret performances in berlin were like at the time the show takes place. That being said, those of you who left during intermission missed a performance that might very well have changed your opinion of the show. i thought the show had a great plot that showed the history of the politics and people of germany when the nazis started to rise to power. ireally enjoyed the "why should i wake up?" scene between cliff and sally as well as the songs "wilkommen" and "cabaret". i thought that the interatcion between herr schultz and fraulein schneider was really cute, including the pineapple song. the emcee was great. my only complaint was the way he pronounced "wilkommen". i thought his interaction with the audience after the kickline was hilarious. sallys voice was great. her "cabaret" was AWESOME. The sexual content was completely approriate, since it was what the performers would have done at the time, as i stated above. to tell the truth, i cant see why audiences arent more shocked by the nazi propoganda banners, the 15 people doing the "heil hitler" salute, and the line "she wouldnt look jewish at all". the shows message is also a good lesson: life isnt always " a cabaret, old chum". you need to know when things are getting really bad so that you can take action. all in all, i think that "cabaret" was a great way to end TUTS' season. i cant wait to come back next year.

By Anonymous on   6/22/2009 3:48 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I thought Cabaret was extremely disappointing. The actors did a good job, it was just so over the top for Houston - not all all what we expected. The Nazi stage at intermission was just left open for us to keep digesting - ugh. The nudity and sex added nothing to the show at all. My husband and I go to the theatre for a good time and enjoyment -- this was not enjoyment at all. I hope TUTS will reconsider before they perform another show such as this one.

By Sue & Walt Rosemind on   6/22/2009 3:55 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I agree With Kathleen Collins on her talkback [6-17-7:42]. Cabaret would make Sodom and Gomorrah blush ! The show was not fit for adults or children-pure filth. We left long before intermission. We have no desire to return to the morals of ancient Rome...Who chooses what plays are presented at TUTS?

By Reese on   6/22/2009 4:06 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I was embarrassed to be seen leaving this show - and left early. When going to Tuts for many
years and season ticket holders we have been encouraged to note that your plays have had some
moments of insinuations however usually is good to taste for the families of Houston. This one is
over the top and the adults sitting around us with teenagers and 10-12 year olds had them duck
their heads - Any show storyline can be made suitable for all ages and persons. This one should
be shown as you chose to do - in a bawdy hooouse.

Anna and friends 6/22/2009 5:00p.m.

By Reese on   6/22/2009 4:29 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

We walked out at 8:00 p.m. with another couple in full disgust. We have been subscribers for
many years and have read reviews previous to attending shows. Of late we have not. as we have
. .However this one was over the top and somehow
it left me feeling "taken" by TUTS. Why would I think that what I saw was funny? Why would I want to continue watching something like this - let alone the message? Does anyone not graphically know what went on in that era? Pornography isn't funny - its sad.

Leah 6/22/2009 5:15 p.m.

By Reese on   6/22/2009 4:38 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

OUTSTANDING !!! OUTSTANDING !!! OUTSTANDING !!!!

The Music, singing and dancing were all very amazing and wonderful.

Thank You TUTS !!!!!

By James on   6/22/2009 5:47 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

This was clearly the worst play that I have ever experienced under the Tuts playbill. Very offension, ptiful acting and singing. It's hard for me to believe any of this could have taken place in 1930's Berlin. This was a real TUTs goof! Very misleading advertising preceeding the performance from Tuts as well as the Chronicle!! Your can do much better than this one!

By robert h on   6/22/2009 6:58 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I'm not sure what most people were expecting with a show called CABARET??!! I for one am glad I do not live in your protected bubble, because there are far worse things going on in this world than what you saw on the TUTS stage. I read the research Thea provided a link to above, it would be nice if others did as well...not just for a precautionary warning, but it might help you enjoy and understand the show better. It did for me. (http://www.tuts.com/images/SeasonShowDocs/CabaretResearch.pdf)

This version of Cabaret blew me away!! There were elements of this show TUTS did that I never noticed or paid attention to in the Mendes version. GREAT JOB TUTS.

You will always have me as a fan.

By Sara Warner on   6/22/2009 7:02 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

"Every time I look at a painting, or listen to a
string quartet, or read a book or a play,
I want something useful and vital to
happen to me. I want to have
my values questioned. I want to be able
to think freshly about things. That's the
function of art." EDWARD ALBEE

Looks like TUTS fulfilled its function according to Albee's definition - seems to be a lot people actually thinking about what they saw. Good for you guys!

By Patrick on   6/22/2009 9:13 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I saw the show last Thursday and it completely captured me from start to finish! Everything from the sets, to th choreography, the acting and the costumes was spot on! Having just read through the many blog posts here, one thing quickly jumps to mind. I wonder if there would be this kind of discussion had the FEMALES been nude or partially so and not the men? I think not! We live in the strip club capital of the world people, such a double standard! The same goes for the so called "simulated sex" scene behind the white curtain. 2 women and one guy = hot while 2 men and 1 woman = perverted. It's the same thing with movies. Show all the full frontal female nudity you want and it barely gets a hard R if that, but God forbid you should show a male naked from the front and you risk an NC-17! As for the comment of who books these shows, look at this season's line up or next season's. Great shows, yes, but there is nothing with any punch...I TRULY APPRECIATE TUTS for taking a chance and giviing it to us straight....so to speak.

By Mr. Cellophane on   6/23/2009 8:25 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I liked the show and appreciat the comments by Mr. Cellophane and Ms. Warner and the Regulars. We are a very diverse city and though TUTS does have a classic image, they did this show because it is a classic of theatre and I love that they brought a slice of life of the performance world. Sexuality, Bigotry, Love and Hate have exsisted as long as man and woman have had free will....this play showed how much fun it was to let loose in a place like the Kit-Kat Klub and how much of a stark change happened when hate played a larger role in society than freedom.

By tuts fan on   6/23/2009 10:01 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I'm glad there is a dialogue on this subject. This exchange inspired a blog on Chron.com regarding this show and expectations/propriety in Houston theatre: http://tinyurl.com/mkj38u

By LolaJRS on   6/23/2009 11:39 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I have attended TUTS for many years with a group of 20-25 friends, including my 2 granddaughters. My granddaughters (17 & 20) left at intermission because of the, way too, graphic nature of the sexually explicit content. I read the warnings but I really did not expect TUTS to go this far. I felt old, prudish, and slightly offended. I loved the music - loved the older couple and the men's chorus, but really, the nudity wasn't necessary, the explicit sexual scenes turned me (and my friends) off. I was disappointed because I couldn't really enjoy this production.

By CARLEEN on   6/24/2009 2:23 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Right on David (David on 6/18/2009 3:32 PM). Overall, it was quite an entertaining production but the lead role especially Sally really lack of "power", she just didnt do justice on "Maybe This Time", what a shame! And the MC, well, he is holding back too much... he is too young & just dont have that "presence"... Nevertheless, bravo to TUTS for such a "refreshing" & daring version of Cabaret!

By P3t3r on   6/24/2009 4:38 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

My husband and I attended last night and speaking for myself, I completely enjoyed it. I had never seen the movie so I had nothing to compare it with, which I think is a plus. Too often when revivals are done the public expects them to be identical to the original version - which makes no sense - otherwise why make a revival? Many people remarked in this blog they thought the production was more "circus" than Cabaret - on which I will agree. And the actress who portrayed Sally did not do the part true justice. I would have expected a more raunchy and gritty performance from a Cabaret singer. However, Emcee was fabulous and the other characters were strong.
Should people find something offensive, whether it is during a live performance, movie, conversation with friends, etc. then by all means they should remove themselves from the situation. But not everyone thinks alike, and if the majority of the audience remained to the end (and offered a standing ovation by the way), I'd say the minority was probably at the wrong play.

By Crystal on   6/24/2009 6:17 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Absolutely loved it. Sally Bowles and the Emcee were fabulous. All of the cast were excellent. The dancers were beautiful and extremely talented. Those who complain about the risque nature of the show need to get a life. I've seen much more sexual innuendo and nudity on network television. Come on people, the name of the show is Cabaret. Have you ever heard of Rick's Cabaret in Houston? What did you expect, a revival meeting? Great job TUTS. One of your best ever.

By Franklin on   6/25/2009 9:08 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Excellent production, one of TUTS best.

Very entertaining because it combined comedy and serious material in a very clever way, that made us respond with a variety of emotions throughout. The Nazi banners were truly disturbing in an emotional way, and leaving them up during intermission was an interesting touch. The illustration of how people were ambivilent to the world changing around them was of course thought provoking and something we all should relate to. Especially the ambivalence of the future vicitms.

The cast was excellent. Sure one could quibble with whether Sally was gritty enough, or this or that. Her tragedy still came through. I believe she was not more gritty because she was on the fence between the outside world the author escaped to, and Berlin and the Cabaret where the world was about to spiral out of control. Had she been more gritty we would never have questioned which decision she would make.

The MC was great and did an excellent job of moving the story along while providing some commentary on what was going on. The "If you could see her as I do" was clever satire on the anti-Semitism and was great absurdity on the personal tragedy of the engaged couple.

I thought the production was never a "plodder", something that often happens in 2nd acts, and struck a great compromise of serious and over the top attitude.

By Bill on   6/25/2009 12:57 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I was expecting great singing & dancing and magical colors. Not all the sexuality and vulgarity. the story line was so small compared to the other things going on. I did not like it at all.

By Maria Gonzalez on   6/25/2009 2:12 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Saw the show on 6/21 and found it EXCELLENT. My complements to the MC for wonderfully delightful acting and singing and to Sally Bowls for her magical voice. It had everything I love about the musical productions: great acting, delighful singing, wonderful sets & costumes. Choosing to purchase the "Cabaraet Style" seating was definitely worth it, as this is the one show one has to experience up close and personal. Having said that, this production was VERY BOLD and a little over the top sexually explicit - definitely not for every theater goer's taste. I am still debating whether this belongs on a big stage or should be toned down a bit... But this is what I love about TUTS! You can't please everyone, so keep daring to be BOLD.

By Rita Lipkin on   6/25/2009 2:40 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I am a long time TUTS subscriber and would not dream on dropping my membership. I was, however, totally stunned by last night's performance. I brought three 13 year old girls with me, as I have always viewed musical theater as generally family friendly. In the previous productions of Cabaret I have attended (even on Broadway), the sexuality and nudity were not nearly so blatant. It was offensive and shocking to the young ladies with me and we were forced to leave during the first act. I was expecting a much more subtle approach based on character development more than the "shock" appeal that seemed to be the order of the evening. My previous memories of the production had prepared me for the content of the production and I had even discussed it with the girls before we arrived. Never did I dream that the sexuality would be so "in your face"- one of the girls stated loudly, "That is just gross" when the young actor bared his bottom when carrying the shower towel. I knew immediately it was time to leave. In the future, I would appreciate some sort of warning if the production is sexually explicit and I would have brought older guests. I understand the desire to bebold and different, but would have liked to know in advance before selecting my guests.

By Diane Cain on   6/25/2009 5:28 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

This is the disclosure:
"Adult Content:
Musical Theatre is a form of art. Powerful artwork can evoke powerful emotions. Cabaret is a politically and emotionally charged show, featuring adult situations relating to the holocaust, Nazi Germany,and sexuality."
I think this disclosure did not go far enough. When I think of "sexuality," I didn't know that it means that a man will hold a banana outright from his crouch and quiver it while his gorilla/girlfriend makes a play for it. Tell me how that adds to the story line. I liked the song "If You Could See Her," but could somebody tell me how the oral sex implication added to the message of the song. I missed the "art" side of that sophomoric scene with the banana.
Also, "sexuality" in the disclosure did not prepare me for the scene where one man is on his knees engaging in oral sex with a woman while another man (who is dressed as a woman) humps him from the backside. I think that as theatre goers we can get the point of "Two Ladies" without such graphics. Where is the "art" in this?
I think that "shock" is a cheap use of art. And where does it stop? This is a musical that would has the elements to be great; the producers did need to cheapen and distract from the musical's message.


By Beth on   6/25/2009 8:03 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Diane and Rita, you are correct. The nudity did not "add to the story line". You could have just read the synopsis and got the full story line without even having to go to the theater.

The nudity, and vulgarity were part of show. Yes of course some it was gross, as Diane's friend observed. That was the whole point, to be gross at times, funny at times, disturbing at times. It is SUPPOSED to create an emotional response. Have you ever been to a Caberet? my understanding is that this was pretty tame stuff by comparison.

Not all shows are the Sound of Music, not all theater is suitable for every age group. That was the point of the warning. If you weren't sure to what degree things would be gross you should have called Tuts and asked.

I have been a season ticket holder for many years, and would take many more Caberet's over another Baby Jane in a heartbeat. Put out another Baby Jane and I will either walk out, or die in my seat of boredom!

By bill on   6/26/2009 8:19 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

This was a fabulous show!! First time I had seen it, although I did my research and knew that it would be risque. I applaud all those who had a hand in staging this production. They must have known that it would generate some strong opinions and I'm glad that they didn't back down from their vision. The beauty of theatre and revivals is seeing someone's interpretation of the role, show, song, etc. I'm glad that TUTS and Houston can bring quality performers to town. Bravo to all the performers in "Cabaret" but especially to Leo Ash Evens and Leslie Kritzer. Loved the Kit Kat Band and the costumes were amazing! Also have to commend the dancers (Leo included) on their high kicks! Overall, an excellent show!!

By Margo on   6/26/2009 8:37 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Margo, I agree with all of your comments about the show and costumes and the dancers. But you did not mention the vulgarity. Why is it a non-subject? Why do some people just blindly accept it? The vulgarity was, in the opinion of many, distracting. You said that you knew the show would be risque, so I guess then it becomes background to the positive side of the show. I think that if we really wanted to visit a "Men's Club" in Houston, we would not have driven to Hobby Center. Houston has plenty of places that we can visit. We came to Hobby to see the show and the songs, as you so aptly noted.

By Sue on   6/26/2009 8:54 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Saw the show last night and enjoyed it, immensely. A lot of energy on the stage.

To me, the Cabaret was a juxtaposition of complete freedom and licensure juxtaposed against the rising strictures of the Third Reich. Both were extremes - how extreme the Nazi strictures were to be is counterbalanced by the extreme libidinous license portrayed in the Cabaret. As such, I thought the nudity and sexually suggestive portrayals were perfectly appropriate. Maybe even a bit tame, considering the opposite state that was to come.

The voices were terrific - Otto (Freddie Kimmel) and men's chorus' 'Tomorrow Belongs To Me' was absolutely sublime and a real surprise. Loved 'The All Girl Kit Kat Klub Orchestra', and I thought Sally (Leslie Kritzer) carried the vocals very well.

I have to agree with others who have noted that the nature of the material was clearly spelled out in the web and paper materials. Those who are complaining it offended their sensibilities would have been better off heeding the notices and staying home.

Thanks for a great show.

By Rick Berger on   6/26/2009 9:15 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Fabulous show!!! It has been a long time since I have been so entertained. Leo Ash Evans was amazing. Leslie Kritzer rocked. The old couple were adorable. The Mens' Chorus on Tommorow Belongs to Me was fantastic. The Dancers were amazing. The Band and Staging were all first rate. This production should go straight to Broadway. This is by far the best show that I have ever seen at TUTS. It had just the right mixture of debauchery and seriousness. To all those who were offended, you were aptly warned and if you chose to attend you should not complain.

By Frank Jacobs on   6/26/2009 9:42 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I'm very surprised that sexuality is the focus of the talk-back rather than the message of the show, when clearly we're still dealing with bigotry and hate today (shooting at holocaust museum just weeks ago).
I LOVED the show, the impact of the flags, the multiple love stories, the unwillingness to acknowledge reality, and the talent of the actors.
The banana joke in "If you could see her through my eyes” made me laugh, and because I was ready to laugh, the end line of the song took me by surprise. The end line packed more punch because it stood in such stark contrast the comical nature of the rest of the song.
-but that's just me....

By sara on   6/26/2009 10:09 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

The director of this show decided to emphasize the "gay" scene and in doing so destroyed the key themes of the original production. The leads were sub-par, intonation was worse than problematic and the cast was apparently bereft of any foreign language coaching. The erstwhile poignant and powerful "Tomorrow Belongs to Me" was absolutely ruined by men in white BVD's and a ballerina of all things. Give me a break!

By Paul on   6/26/2009 12:00 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Re: Thea chimes in on the fierce discussion happening in our "Cabaret" talkback!

I have read through all of the comments and I am astounded at the lack of understanding of this brilliant musical. As a person of theatrical background, I have seen and participated in this production several times. As a participant in this production, and someone who has also taught about the Holocaust and Nazi Germany, I too have engaged in extensive research of this time period. Much of the art and music of this period was decadent and in some cases, grotesque. Is that really difficult to envision in the light of what was happening socially, politically and morally in Nazi Germany?! This production of Cabaret, particularly, acurately captures the levels of decadence and grotesqueness of this horrific time in history. Is it so hard to understand that a culture could bury itself in lewd behavior, rather than dealing with the evils of the Nazi regime? For those who were offended by the production, you were notified and warned, and what should offend you is what not the way in which this musical was presented, but by its source and troubling subject matter-Hitler's Nazi Germany. I am not easily impressed by theatrical productions and I did not, being so familiar with this musical, expect it to have such an impact on me. It sometimes takes true courage to produce art and the TUTS production of Cabaret has indeed produced a work of art.

By Cherre on 6/26/2009 1:35 PM

By Cherre on   6/26/2009 1:45 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

TUTS is a business. Somebody has to help pay the rent and salaries. The money from the sponsors don't cover everything, doe's it? If TUTS wants to be like the big boys in NY where everything is acceptable, they have to accept the fact that they may be selling a product that is not popular in Houston. Many of the season holders can live in NY if they wanted to, and they choose to live in Houston FOR A REASON. If TUTS wants to produce musicals that offends a large number of their base, then TUTS has to accept the consequences of that action. Granted TUTS can produce what they want to produce and how they produce it, but their patrons can decide not to go. At what cost will that be to the city of Houston? How many of the Broadway shows have gone dark in this economic climate? TUTS can make the decision that these off-beat shows are good for us and make us think. But we can think, "This is my entertainment time and money, and I don't want to go." The people who enjoy the risque scenes liked that sort of thing before they came. The people who felt that TUTS pushed the envelope too far had those same feelings about sexuality before they walked into the theatre. I can not believe that this production opened anyone's eyes to the wonder of vulgarity. (I do hope that TUTS did not include the vulgarity in this production because, as many in the entertainment business say, any publicity is good publicity.)

By Sam on   6/26/2009 2:18 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

wow! what a show. It actually got people talking and thinking. I believe that all of this is exactly what Cabaret is about. The Sexuality and nudiity of Berlin of that time was rampant in the late 20's and 30's. I believe that the skin was totaly appropriate. it above all is a historical piece and that was part of that scene. I would challenge negative ignorant bloggers to actually do some research and actually learn about the sexuality,politics, homosexuality, the Nazis (which this play is not about) This show challenges the human spirit and provokes some serious emotions. FOr thiose of you who walked out... shame on you, however maybe ignorance is best for you, contiinue to live under your shell and dont experience life. AND by the way there is plenty of very clear warning about this show, I guess the iggnorant people chose to ignore those as well as the truly accurate history of this production. BRAVO to the obviously well informed and educated creative team, The gorgeous cast, the beautiful orchestra the wonderful crew and to TUTS for allowing this show to continue to educate so that something as horrid as that part of history will NEVER happen again.

By Ted on   6/26/2009 11:26 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

PAUL, I just read your comment. what is your knowledge on that part of the show? BVD'S? maybe had you done your research you would find the reason that the men were wearing all white. I am sure you did not, cause had you done any research you would have also ran across the reason Homosexuality was presented in the way it was in this production. Oh and I am so glad it was not the original production, I could not have seen another all black and dark version of this story. I have reccomended this show to many of my local friends.

By Ted on   6/26/2009 11:33 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I am confused whenever a blogger here defends the vulgarity of the show by saying that the production was a "truly historical piece." The audience, I am sure, is able to draw conclusions without such graphics. One of the most powerful scenes of the show was the last scene in the first act when the flags are dropped and the characters salute the flags and march out. The flags represented much more than material hanging from the rafters, the salute really was not directed to the material of the flags, and the characters were not just exiting the stage because it was intermission. We understood the meaning, and we felt the emotion. We got it. Really. When someone says that they are pregnant, we understand it. They don't have to hand us a picture of them having sex to understand that they are pregnant. That picture may be historically accurate, but ... you know, we can understand and feel emotion without the picture. Sometimes the graphics just might distract from the message.

By Anne on   6/27/2009 7:53 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Anne- You might get the picture without the actual thing, but are you assuming ALL people understand these messages clearly? And dont confuse defense with informing :)

By Ted on   6/27/2009 10:58 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Ted,
At intermission, I walked out to the balcony and was surprised to see a a steady stream of valet drivers pull up cars for TUTS patrons to leave. I can only imagine the exodus from the self-parking garage. It made to sad to watch so many TUTS patrons leave unhappy. I figure that most of their evenings had started on a much happier note. They had probably paid hundreds of dollars for their group of tickets, they had dressed up in fancy clothes, and they had probably had a nice meal somewhere in the area with people they care about. Then they find their seats, glance through their Playbills, and before the know it, they are witness to a menage a trois. How did that happen? And was it needed? Most of TUT'S patrons are well-educated; I do not think that they left because they questioned the historical accuracy of the show. I think that they left because they could no longer trust the producer of Cabaret, and they wondered if the next sailor would appear without a towel or maybe the sheet would be absent on the next menage a trois. If TUTS really wanted their audience to understand the message clearly, why did TUTS present it in a way that caused many in their audience to pull out their valet tickets and call for their cars in the middle of the production? Was TUT's purpose to educate or to shock? If the purpose was to educate, it could have been done without this degree of vulgarity. If the purpose was to shock, it was successful.

By Anne on   6/27/2009 2:57 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Anne- I think it is so simple. It provked thought and emotion weather it was good or bad, these people felt something and i can gaurantee you they are still thinking about whatever it was that made them leave. Bravo to a brave production which evokes this response. I am sure the cast is focusing on the thousands that stay and jump to their feet. Honestly people leave during productions such as Seven Brides because of simple things that offend, there is no pleasing everyone, but have no fear I see that Sound of music is in the line up and I am sure those people that left will feel safe knowing what to expect.....and that is their right.

By Ted on   6/27/2009 11:43 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Anne, as I commented to others before, you are correct. You can be told that Hitler was on the rise, without the banners and salutes, you can be told the 1930s Berlin was vulgar and care-free without seeing the vulgarity, in fact you could have read the book and not even gone to the theater. All of you who point out that the graphic displays did not add to the story line are correct, everyone could have just read the synopsiis and stayed home.

The whole point of the show was to graphically describe the multiple forces at work at this time. It was supposed to evoke an emotional response, which it did. The comedy, vugalrity, politics were all combined in a clever way to get us to think about subjects we normally dont like to confront, namely bigotry, indifference, the rights of minorities, and recognize these things in our own lives. It did these things while at the same time entertaining us.

The real question for those who did not like the show is this: Would you prefer that this show be modified to suit your tastes? or is it valid for others with different tastes to see a show that they like, and which you can simply avoid?

By bill on   6/28/2009 7:47 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Having seen Cabaret now twice, all the way through i might add, i think that most of these bloggers must have been focused more on seeing that stupid shooting star on the ceiling, rather than watching the art that was unfolding on stage. To those who think the sexual content was too much, i encourage you to go read the script for this show and do a little research on your own about what a true cabaret was like before the nazi oppression. You don't have to go far to research because TUTS gave you a link to view in every press release sent out. I think the harsh thoughts on the sexuality issue are a direct representation of how little ground we've made in human rights. The fact that two men showed their backsides elicits this much response makes me wonder if the only time these patrons get out is to see a show. There is nudity of men and women on basic cable almost any night of the week, and i ask how many of you have cancelled your cable subscription because of it? The fact that someone would say that the beautiful quintet of "Tomorrow Belongs to Me" was RUINED by a "ballerina" and men in "BVD'S" is absurd and downright homophobic. Having listened to many versions of this song, this arrangement was the most beautiful and emotional i've heard yet. It most certainly was not ruined.

The sexual tones were not pushed into the audience and brought out. This was how these performers would have been in the time before Hitler. Having seen countless shows in NYC and across the region i think this show had a little less in-your-face boldness than others. In New York right now it's rare to see a show without some form of nudity in it, sex sells. The fact that people were so offended is amazing to me. Get out from under your rock and experience art. To the person who said they hated this show as much as they hated HAIR because of the nudity are missing the point of both shows, to make you think about your morals and do something, be active. These are two of the most groundbreaking shows in American Musical Theatre.

Also I think it's funny how people didn't "know" there would be adult content when i made a joke to a friend that there were posters and placards all OVER the theatre saying what this show contained. There was practically a sign at every restroom, water fountain, ticket booth. They should have just put one above every toilet and then maybe someone would have seen them.

Overall, this was one of the best shows i've seen anywhere and definantly the best from TUTS. It got me thinking about the world around me and what i could do to stop a movement like the Nazi's from happening again. it made me think outside of my bubble and realize not everything is beautiful all the time no matter how we cover it up with make-up, lights, glitter. The performances were amazing on all levels, it's rare you find someone so able to make songs their own and still be able to deliver in book scenes. The world needs to watch out for Leslie Kritzer and Leo Ash Evans because they will be so successful. Anyway, brava! to the WHOLE cast and crew on a great show... i only wish somewhere between Grease and Sound of Music, next season, there was another brave piece of theatre.

By Patti Lu-ping-pong on   6/28/2009 2:55 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

WHAT A SHOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is the 4th time that I have seen this magnificant show and by all means on of the best ones. It has come a long way since first seen. The one thing I missed was Liza's short black hair. In an art form, the nudity was valid and very well presented. Boys and girls were beautiful. Life is a CABARET people. We see this and much more on regular tv shows and fashion magazines. Live and let live. Next time read the ads when they state, NUDITY. If you found this show offensive then i am very sorry for you, small minded people. The show depicted a true cabaret from that era before Nazi regimme. WELL DONE GUYS GREAT SHOW. KEEP BREAKING THOSE LEGS!!!! LOVED IT and will be highly recommended to many friends. JOB WELL DONE.

PS. STOP THE SEXUAL FRUSTRATIONS PEOPLE. IT IS ART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Ala Verge on   6/28/2009 11:25 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I saw the Mendes revival on Broadway many years ago, so I was eager to see this variation on the show. Enjoyed it for the most part, although I was disappointed in the woman who played Sally Bowles. She tried to do too much with 'Cabaret'. She should have just sung it straightforward and without all the inflections - many times she made the lyrics unintelligible, which ruins the imact of the song. Same holds true for 'Maybe This Time'. And she kind of looked and acted like Carol Burnett - which was distracting.
Other than that - it was a good production. I took my mom, who is in her 70s, and she was not offended. I had warned her about the sexual nature of the show, though.

By S Warren on   6/29/2009 4:02 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

We have been season subscribers for eight or nine years now. This type of production warrants
no more season tickets. The nudity, was definitely not necessary for the storyline. The filthy simulated sex acts were embarrassing, to say the least. We observed people leaving early during the show. Had it just been my husband and I, we would have done the same, but we were with another couple. The four of us have enjoyed many beautiful productions over these past years, but this certainly was not one of them. Many may call it art, as many modern-day thinkers do; but this was filth and so below the standards of TUTS. Shame on you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Dolores on   6/29/2009 4:04 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I did not care for the nudity or the vulgarity of the show. I did not understand half of what the MC was saying. (I had to keep reading it..I know..I know..supposed to be Berlin)..Come on TUTS...give us a break...

By Ruth on   6/29/2009 5:55 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I can't believe so many of you have tried to sell this production as "art". I, too, have been a season subscriber for many years, but this is definitely my last season! There were several sub-par shows this year, but none so totally offensive as this was. Further, as a season subscriber, this ticket was part of the package. I don't feel I should have to check out every show first to see if it is acceptable to see, and if not, to eat the cost of our tickets. At the least, productions such as this should be part of the extra shows TUTS offers during the year so that people who do wish to partake of this "art" form can do so while the rest of us are not subjected to such debauchery. It wasn't just a few people who walked out on these performances, and that should tell TUTS something....

By Mary B on   6/29/2009 5:55 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

The unnecessary vulgarity in this production was a distraction to the very fine parts of the show, i.e. the political messages and the real love story of the older couple who were actually the best singers and actors in the show. The actress playing Sally Bowles was totally miscast and was not believable in the part. I was very disappointed in her performance. I suspect many people left before this show was over as the theatre did not look as full at the end. I think that Theater and for that matter the Arts in Houston is mostly only attended by people who are 50 and up as I did not see many young people at this performance. Perhaps TUTS should consider their audience before running a show with such obvious and unnecessary vulgarity.

By Linda on   6/29/2009 9:12 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I love this play!!! We saw this show in London last year and loved it. We were disappointed with the performance in Houston. It wasn't nearly as risque and it lost the central point about the ominous threat of the Nazis. The ending in London really brought that fact home. The ending in this performance was lackluster. We thought the Herr Schultz was a weak character, but his love interest had a wonderful voice. Those who think this show was vulgar, do not understand what the play is about. And, they certainly wouldn't have understood the London performance. I'm tired of Houston patrons who cannot view shows with nudity, etc. and get beyond that level. They do not understand how important the social milieu is to the whole production.

By Danny on   6/29/2009 10:48 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Fantastic performance all around!! BRAVO!!

By JD on   6/29/2009 11:48 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I really believe in supporting TUTS, they're our largest (and I think oldest) non-profit musical theatre company. Plus they do a TON in the community. Even if this one show wasn't up your alley, I really hope subscribers wouldn't honestly consider throwing away or cancelling their entire subscription becuase of one show.

Next season has nothing like this. It's safe for everyone. I hope the foks who didn't like Cabaret will reconsider before pulling their support from a great organization....

By sara on   6/30/2009 8:24 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Dolores, Mary, Ruth and Linda. You make me sad. Enjoy your safe, uninformed, un-educated and sheltered world. Maybe you dont deserve to see shows like this. Enjoy sound of music! (FYI there are Nazis in that)

By Ted on   7/2/2009 3:42 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

My goodness people . . . do your homework! Complaining about the vulgarity and sexuality in Cabaret is akin to complaining about all of the red, white, and blue at a 4th of July celebration.

By Chris Lewis on   7/3/2009 2:01 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

Do your homework? I am not thinking that EVERY version of Cabaret has this degree of graphic vulgarity. I do not disagree that there is more vulgarity and sexuality in SOME other versions, but are you saying that this show can not be produced without this degree of graphics? The Houston Chronicles says, "...the tawdry decadence ...have grown more pronounced with each new “take.” The Chronicle also quotes the TUT's director as saying, "It lends itself to different interpretations." It seems, when doing my homework, that not even the songs are consistent in all of the versions.
Cabaret is a great show with fantastic music which is done quite often. The TUT's producers made a decision to stage this version, and then TUT's sent me an e-mail asking for my opinion and linked to this blog.
What is with those who are critical of other's opinions on this blog? I am always amazed when some people who consider themselves to be very open-minded can be so closed-minded and intolerant of others whose opinions do not match their own. Yes, many people walked out of the performance and several people on this blog have expressed their disgust of this musical, but the criticism was to this musical. Then, they get personally blasted, called uniformed, un-educated, ignorant, because they have an opinion that differs from others. I think tolerance means not being critical about patrons who have made a conscious decision to exit this show early. I am not being critical of the positive opinions of the show, but rather the personal name-calling of those who feel differently than you about the show.

By Connie on   7/4/2009 2:59 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I just have to say that after reading Linda's comment about the Arts in Houston being attended only by those 50 years-old and up, I was highly offended. As a teenager who has lived in Houston for the greater part of my life, I highly disagree. Myself and many friends of mine saw this production, and we absolutely loved it! We live in a community that not only wants to teach the Arts to a younger generation, but strives to. I myself was able to participate in TUTS' very own Tommy Tune Awards, a program that is built around high school srudents who participate in the Arts. As for the "vulgarity" of the show, nothing that was in this production was unnecessary to the story. The musical is called "Cabaret," of course this show is not going to be for the faint of heart. TUTS stayed true to the feel and mood of the show, it is set during a time that was not very pleasant, where sex and drugs ruled the Berlin nightlife. I have come to expect sex in Cabaret, just like I would expect fishnets and heels in The Rocky Horror Show or even, dare I say, ruby sleppers in The Wizard of Oz. It is a necesaary component of the story and the characters. I would just like to thank TUTS for giving Houston a show that was edgy, unexpected, and different. Sadly, next season all we have to look forward to are shows like Sound of Music, a classic, but a very "safe" choice. Please keep bringing shows like Cabaret to the Houston audiences!!!

By Heath Jones on   7/10/2009 10:45 AM

Re: Cabaret talkback

I thought TUTS did a great job with this show and I applaud them for doing it the way they did. Not all theater shows need to be "family friendly" just as not all events in life are. This production may not have been done this way in the past, but even theater has too keep up with the times, just look at Avenue Q and Spring Awakening. Please keep doing these kinds of shows in the future!

By Jackie on   7/13/2009 2:44 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

blog
iyinet frmtr trkygnclr webmaster seo yarışması
film izle
mp3 indir
mp3 dinle

By sdadsadsa on   3/28/2010 5:48 PM

Re: Cabaret talkback

blog
iyinet frmtr trkygnclr webmaster seo yarışması
film izle
mp3 indir
mp3 dinle

By adsdsadsa on   3/28/2010 5:48 PM

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment    Cancel  
There are no categories in this blog.

Blog Archive

 

The views, conclusions, findings and opinions of the authors are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Theatre Under The Stars or their employees. This blog is “family friendly” and comments which include offensive or inappropriate language, or considered by Theatre Under The Stars to be rude and offensive, will be edited or deleted.

 
Bookmark and Share